【一包養網站黎漢基】孟子是《公羊傳》先師嗎

requestId:688500eaf21d31.22282241.

Is Mencius the pioneer of “Gongyang”?

Author: Li Hanji (School of Public Governance Research in Zhongshan University, Political and Public Colleagues Governance)

Source: “Philosophy Dynamics” 2025 Issue 3

Abstract: “Generation” was discussed in “Mencius”, but “Mencius” and other late Confucian literature did not mention “Gongyang”. Some words in Mencius are similar to the worldly version of “The Ram” but this does not prove that the views of “The Ram” come from “The Ram” or related academic traditions. Therefore, more cautious students do not list Mencius in “The Ram”. In recent years, students such as Zeng Yi and others have identified Mencius as the pioneer of “Gongyang Biography” in their works such as “History of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the A However, the evidence is not trusted, and the recommendation is flawed, and it is not a scientific conclusion that can be accepted.

Keywords: “Mencius”, “Year” and “Gongyang” are studied

“Year” is mentioned in “Mencius”, but “Mencius” and other late Confucian literature do not mention “Gongyang”. Reading Mencius, readers may find that some of these words are similar to the world-class version of “Rams”, but most mathematicians are more cautious and do not list Mencius in “Rams”. (See Ruan Zhisheng, page 41; Lin Yizheng, page 21) However, in recent years, the way of treating Mencius as a predecessor of “The Ram” has appeared. For example, Zeng Yi and others made this proposal in “History of the Ram” in “The History of the Ram”. Can their views be entitled? What presets did their views be made? Can the relevant evidence be valid? The analysis of these problems will lead to a deeper understanding of the actual faces of the development of Chinese academics in late China. And this discussion also discusses the problem through research methods, that is, we need specific analysis of specific problems and should not be unrestrained.

1 The preset of the “Take Master” discussion

Traveling the origin and the academic community takes Mencius as the lead in “Gongyang Biography” not Zeng Yi’s solo creation. Previously, some scholars emphasized the close relationship between Mencius and Gongyang School, and believed that Mencius’s “Year” was not a essay on “Year”, but a “subtle statement” of “Year”. That is, Mencius’ interpretation of Confucius’ “Year”, that is, the later generations of “Gongyang” and “Gongyang” oral statements. Therefore, Mencius’s studies have many similarities with Gongyang School. Mencius is one of the pioneers of Gongyang School’s “Gongyang Festival”. This proposal can be discussed in detail. One important statement here is the so-called “repeating the text of “Years” and writing books”. This sentence comes from “Historical Records: The Year Table of the Twelve Marquis”: “Zuoqiu, a native of Lu Zheng,Everyone in Ming Dynasty was strange and had their own meanings and their true meanings were distorted. Therefore, because Confucius’ historical records specifically discuss their words, they created “Zuo’s Age”. Liu Jiao was the tutor of King Wei of Chu, and was the king of the king, and he was unable to support the pipeline and read the “Year”, and took the 40 chapters of the death, which was the “Liushi Wei”. When King Xiaocheng of Zhao, his prime minister Yu Qing collected “Year” and read the following articles, and wrote eight articles, which are “Year of the Yu Family”. Those who are not allowed to go to the scene are recommended by King Xiang of King Xiang, who also admires the ancients and compiles the current affairs of the six countries, thinking that it is the eight views, six comments, and twelve chapters, which are the “Year of the Sixth Family”. Those who like Xun Qing, Mencius, Gong Sun Gu and Han Fei often wrote books on the articles of “Year” and had a different story. ”

The above records show that after Confucius’ death, various interpretations and works appeared in “Year” include “Zuo’s Year”, “Yu’s Year”, “Yu’s Year”, and “Yu’s Year”. Under this atmosphere of thinking, Xun Qing, Mencius, Gong Sungu, Han Fei and others also collected “The text of “Year”” when they “written books”. This “The text of “Year” is understood by Sima, and it is appropriate to interpret it as the text of “Year”. It does not refer to “big meanings” or “Gongyang” texts and “Gongyang” oral words. Mencius is the subject of “repellent”, which has undestructible self-reliance and ability, and “written” describes Mencius’ interpretation of “Gongyang” and not the interpretation of Confucius’ interpretation of “Gongyang”. However, the so-called Mencius’ interpretation of “Gongyang” and the “translation” of Gongyang” is not about Mencius’ work of “writing”, but about Mencius’s original meaning of “Gongyang”. href=”https://twilovedating999.com/”>原文 “translation” of things other than body thinking. Here, Mencius’s scent is: A. The scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of the scent of Confucius’ learning in Gongyang did not mess with his own private life. If Mencius had already planned to say that his own private goods, then Mencius would not have called him the predecessor of Gongyang. But according to Sima, Mencius, who “repeated the text of “Year” and wrote books”, seemed to be no longer a big deal.

In addition , since “Confucius’ explanation of “Year”, “Ram” and “Confucius” are different expressions, this means that Mencius, known as “the pioneer of “Yang Zhi”, is limited to the words of “Yang Zhi” and “Yang Zhi”, and there should be no other things. This also means that Mencius’s words about “Yang Zhi” include : B. The independence of the Ram. In recognition of this, there is a seemingly convenient advantage in dealing with the relationship between Mencius and Gongyang. Mencius: Mencius only talks about “age” and not “Ram”. However, if “Confucius’ explanation of “age”” and “Ram” are equivalent, you can search for the dry and dead place to stabilize MenciusThe words of “Age” belong to the “Ram School”. However, this judgment faces the following challenge: If in any record shows that Mencius has content that is close to or similar to “The Legend of the White” or “The Legend of the White” or other non-The Legend of the Ram”, it will form a countermeasure that it must fight. To effectively resolve this challenge means that the writer should not only show the relationship between Mencius and Ram, but also check whether there are other elements in Mencius that cannot be tolerated with “Rams”.